Did a Friend Forward this Email?
You Can Subscribe for Free Here!
"Republics fail because cowards give power to would-be Caesars under false pretense of emergency." — Jonah Goldberg
Today's developments converge on a central constitutional theme: the limits of executive power and the political consequences when those limits are tested.
As the House prepares to vote on ending America's longest government shutdown, the Supreme Court signals skepticism toward President Trump's unilateral tariff authority, while electoral data reveals significant Latino voter backlash against aggressive executive action.
These stories illuminate the tension between constitutional governance and consolidated presidential power.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLOSING THOUGHTS: The through-line connecting today's stories is unmistakable: when executive power overreaches constitutional bounds and ignores political consequences, institutions push back—whether through judicial skepticism, legislative necessity, or electoral rebuke.
The question remaining is whether conservative jurists will apply their own stated principles consistently, or whether deference to executive emergency claims will erode the separation of powers they claim to defend.